2024 Volume 5
Creative Commons License

Investigating the Effects of Physical Activity on the Amount of Muscle Cramp Pain in Hemodialysis Patients


, ,
  1. Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  2. Division of Nephrology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract

Due to the physical weakness and low level of physical endurance in chronic kidney failure patients and also because most patients are dialyzed through the veins of the hand, exercise using the legs is the best option for improving muscle cramps and improving their quality of life. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of physical activity on muscle cramps in patients referred to the hemodialysis department. The current study is a semi-experimental type and the sample size was determined by using previous studies and the sample size formula, 34 people. Sampling was done using available sampling, and then the samples were divided into intervention and control groups by drawing cards. The implementation of the physical activity program was such that for the patients of the intervention group, the walking program was carried out for 30 minutes, 3 times a week immediately after the end of the hemodialysis session or with the prior coordination of the patient. The visual analog scale for muscle cramp pain intensity was completed at the beginning and end of the intervention in two groups. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using SPSS23 software. The results of this study showed that there was no significant difference between the average muscle cramp pain before the intervention in the control and intervention groups (P > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between the average muscle cramp pain scores after the intervention in the control and intervention groups (P < 0.05), so after the intervention, the average muscle cramp pain score in the intervention group was reduced compared to the control group. The present study showed that physical activity was effective in muscle cramp pain.


Keywords: Hemodialysis patients, Physical activity, Muscle cramp, Pain

Introduction

Hemodialysis is a treatment method in end-stage chronic kidney failure patients. Chronic renal failure refers to the irreversible failure of kidney function from a clinical point of view, which has a progressive course, and most patients need alternative treatment, either permanent hemodialysis or kidney transplantation [1-4]. Chronic renal failure is defined as any damage to the kidney or a decrease in glomerular filtration rate to less than 60 ml per minute, per 1.73 square meters of body surface, lasting more than three months [1].

The incidence and prevalence of chronic kidney failure have increased dramatically throughout the world during the past few decades, and the incidence of this disease in most countries is more than 200 cases per one million people per year [5, 6]. Among the possible causes the disease can be attributed to diabetes, low physical activity, blood pressure, high cholesterol and other blood lipids, smoking, gender, environmental factors, alcohol consumption, noise and mental stress, air pollution, use of certain drugs, kidney and urinary tract infections, cysts and congenital disorders, anatomical disorders, and defects, as well as regional and geographical issues [2, 7, 8]. When the glomerular filtration of the kidneys reaches 10-15% of the normal level, there will be a need to use alternative methods to compensate for the lost normal function of the kidneys. These methods include hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplant, the most common of these methods being hemodialysis [3].

According to researchers' reports, muscle structure abnormalities are more evident in patients who are undergoing dialysis than in patients who have chronic kidney failure but have not yet undergone dialysis [9-11]. The cause of skeletal muscle breakdown in hemodialysis patients is not yet fully understood; but factors such as acidosis, oxidative stress, hyperparathyroidism, neuropathy, restriction of protein diet, anorexia, cytokinin, abnormalities in vitamin D metabolism or calcium concentration, insufficient dialysis and dialysis treatment are involved in this [12-14]. Hemodialysis patients are prone to muscle cramps during dialysis and between dialysis sessions. These cramps are often very painful and destructive and have harmful effects on the patient's quality of life [15]. Reports have shown that 24-86% of hemodialysis patients experience muscle cramps [16].

Quinine sulfate has been used for four decades to treat hemodialysis-related muscle cramps, but concerns about quinine use have been raised for many years [17]. The answer to this question is unknown, to what extent are limitations in physical performance as an inevitable result of renal failure or dialysis treatment? And to what extent is it the result of poor mobility? Therefore, the question that arises is what the beneficial effects of regular physical activity are for hemodialysis patients. Considering the physical weakness and low level of physical endurance of hemodialysis patients, and also because most of the patients are dialyzed through the veins of the hand, and taking into account past research, sports exercises using the legs are the best option for these patients [18-20]. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of physical activity on muscle cramps in patients referred to the dialysis department.

Materials and Methods

This study is a semi-experimental research, with a pre-test-post-test design, with two intervention and control groups. In this research, considering the power of 85%, α = 0.05 (significance level) according to the objectives of the study and previous studies, d = 3 (difference in the average quality of life score of the intervention and control groups at the end of the study) and s = 87.3 (standard deviation of the quality of life score), the sample size was 30, and taking into account the drop of 10%, a total of 34 people were determined, using the card drawing method, 17 people in the intervention group and 17 people in the group was controlled.

It should be noted that all patients were identical in terms of the type of dialysis machine and equipment used, the type of strainers used, the type of dialysis fluid, etc., and also the relative homogeneity of the research samples in terms of culture and society through the demographic characteristics questionnaire before the start of the research. The participants were assured that the present study does not interfere with the treatment process of the patients. It was also explained that participation in this study is completely voluntary and they have the right to withdraw from the study at any stage of the research, and the results obtained are completely confidential and will be published without mentioning their names and surnames. Then, the demographic information questionnaire was completed in both groups before the intervention. Demographic profile questionnaire including gender, age, marital status, level of education, employment status, place of residence, income, high blood pressure, the primary cause of kidney disease, diabetes, glomerulonephritis, etc., duration of dialysis, duration of kidney disease, number of times Dialysis per week is the amount of hemoglobin, albumin and dialysis adequacy. Also, the visual analog scale for muscle cramp pain intensity was completed at the beginning and end of the intervention in two groups. This scale is horizontally graded as a line between 0 and 10, and the two sides of its range are enclosed on the left side of the phrase no pain and the right side of the phrase the worst imaginable pain = 10. The patient is asked to select only one number from 0 to 10 according to the level of pain in the last 48 hours and draw a circle around it. A score of 1-3 indicates mild pain, 4-7 moderate pain, and 8-10 severe pain [21]. The study of Alghadir et al. [22] in Saudi Arabia showed the internal consistency of the visual pain scale to be 0.97.

The implementation of the intervention program was that for the patients of the intervention group, a walking program was carried out for 30 minutes, 3 times a week immediately after the end of the hemodialysis session or with the prior arrangement of the patient in the open area of ​​the hospital. Before implementing the physical activity program, in each session, the vital signs, blood pressure, pulse, and breathing of the patients were controlled by the researcher, and if the vital signs were abnormal, the patients were verbally asked if there was a problem from the company's point of view. If the patient expressed discomfort and intolerance to the exercise program, physical activity was not performed for the person on that day and was postponed to another day with the coordination of the patient. In this study, none of the research units had any problem in participating in the physical activity program. The program included four stages warming up and preparing the body (5 minutes), brisk walking based on the patient's tolerance (10 minutes), walking at a slow speed and cooling the body (5 minutes), and 10 minutes of rest. The 5-minute warm-up was such that the patients first walked very slowly to prepare their bodies. Then they entered the main walking program and had a fast walk for 10 minutes. At this stage, the patients were told to go as fast as they could to feel their heart rate increase. Then, to cool down the body, they slowed down their walking speed and walked at a slow speed for 5 minutes. Then, to relax the body, they sat on a chair and took deep breaths with closed eyes for 10 minutes. The walking exercise program was carried out for 8 weeks. It should be noted that the program of physical activity and relaxation, which lasted 30 minutes in total, did not interfere with the schedule and duration of the hemodialysis routine.

Data analysis using SPSS version 23 statistical software in the form of descriptive statistics (tables, average, and standard deviation) and inferential statistics methods and statistical tests including Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, paired t-test, independent t-test, exact test Fisher, and chi-square test analysis was performed.

Results and Discussion

18 patients (52.9%) were male and 16 patients (47.1%) were female. The age of the participants was between 35 and 65 years. 22 patients (64.7%) were married and 11 patients (32.3%) were single. About 7 of the patients (20.5%) were illiterate and the rest of the participants had primary education or higher. About 30 people (88.2%) of the participants were unemployed or did not have a fixed job.

Table 1. Distribution of qualitative demographic variables between two groups without physical activity and with physical activity in patients referred to the hemodialysis department.

Variable

Group

Significant level

No physical activity

With physical activity

N

%

N

%

Gender

Female

9

52.9

7

41.2

X2 = 0.472

P = 0.492

Male

8

47.1

10

58.8

Education level

Illiterate

2

11.8

5

29.4

X2 = 4.225

P = 0.238

Elementary

2

11.8

4

23.5

Diploma

5

29.4

5

29.4

Bachelor and above

8

47.1

3

17.6

Marital status

Single

7

41.2

4

23.5

X2 = 2.443

P = 0.282

Married

9

52.9

13

76.5

Etc.

1

5.9

0

0

Place of residence

City

9

52.9

8

47.1

X2 = 0.118

P = 0.732

Village

8

47.1

9

52.9

Way of life

Alone

2

11.8

0

0

P = 0.485

With family

15

88.2

17

100

Employment status

Employed

2

11.8

2

11.8

X2 < 0.001

P > 0.999

Unemployed

15

88.2

15

88.2

Primary cause of kidney disease

high blood pressure

5

29.4

6

35.3

F = 0.319

P = 0.999

diabetes

3

17.6

4

23.5

Glomerulonephritis

1

5.9

0

0

Etc.

8

47.1

7

41.2

Duration of hemodialysis

Less than 25 months

4

23.5

6

35.3

X2 = 4.944

P = 0.176

Between 25 and 50 months

7

41.2

6

35.3

Between 50 and 70 months

5

29.4

1

5.9

More than 75 months

1

5.9

4

23.5

Number of hemodialysis

Twice a week

2

11.8

1

5.9

X2 = 0.366

P = 0.545

Three times a week

15

88.2

16

94.1

Duration of hemodialysis

3 hours

0

0

3

17.6

P = 0.227

More than 3 hours

17

100

14

82.4

From Chi-Square and Fisher's exact test, the frequency distribution of the variables between the two control and intervention groups is almost similar and not significant, and they have a homogeneous distribution between the two groups.

Table 2. Comparison of the mean of quantitative demographic variables between two groups without physical activity and with physical activity in patients referred to the hemodialysis department.

Variable

Group

Significant level

No physical activity

With physical activity

Age

46.88 ± 10.47

46.88 ± 12.33

P > 0.999, t < 0.001

Number of children

1.24 ± 1.2

2.53 ± 2.48

P = 0.061, t = -1.938

Systolic blood pressure

117.94 ± 10.67

117.06 ± 20.85

P = 0.878, t = 0.155

Diastolic blood pressure

75.29 ± 10.07

71.76 ± 11.31

P = 0.344, t = 0.961

Pulse

78.58 ± 3.69

75.29 ± 5.64

P = 0.052, t = 2.014

Breathing

17.65 ± 0.79

16.94 ± 1.34

P = 0.071, t = 1.868

Temperature

35.24 ± 0.28

36.75 ± 0.4

P = 0.399, t = -0.855

Hemodialysis adequacy (K/tv)

1.15 ± 0.25

1.08 ± 0.18

P = 0.311, t = 1.029

Hemodialysis adequacy (URR)

0.68 ± 0.15

0.63 ± 0.1

P = 0.217, t = 1.258

Hemoglobin level

9.31 ± 1.88

10.82 ± 2.23

P = 0.04, t = -2.14

Albumin level

3.79 ± 0.34

3.67 ± 0.68

P = 0.536, t = 0.626

Table 2 showed that according to the results of the independent t-test, the average variables of age, number of children, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, breathing, temperature, adequacy of hemodialysis, and albumin level between the two intervention and control groups are almost equal and was not statistically significant. This is while the variable of the average amount of hemoglobin between the two control and intervention groups was statistically significant and was included as a confounding effect in the study results to adjust its effect.

Table 3. Comparison of the average pain visual analog scale score before and after the intervention between without physical activity and with physical activity in patients referred to the hemodialysis department.

Variable

Group

Significant level

No physical activity

With physical activity

Muscle cramp pain

Before intervention

5.41 ± 0.62

6.47 ± 1.38

t = -2.896

P = 0.007

After intervention

5.88 ± 0.485

5 ± 1.23

F = 65.28

P < 0.001

Significant level

t = 3.108

P = 0.007

t = -11.785

P < 0.001

-

Table 3 shows that according to the results of the independent t-test, the average muscle cramp pain score between the two groups without physical activity and with physical activity, before the start of the intervention, is statistically significant. Therefore, comparing the mean score of muscle cramp pain after the intervention of the two effects of confounding the hemoglobin level and the visual analog pain scale before the controlled intervention, and according to the results of the analysis of covariance, the mean score of muscle cramp pain between the two groups is significant. Also, the average score of muscle cramp pain in the group without physical activity and with physical activity according to the results of the paired t-test were significant, that in the group without physical activity, the score of muscle cramp pain increased and in the group with physical activity, the score of cramp pain decreased.

This study was conducted to determine the effect of physical activity on muscle cramp pain in patients referred to the dialysis department. The results of the present study showed that the mean scores of muscle cramp pain in the group without physical activity and with physical activity were significant according to the results of the paired t-test. In the group without physical activity, the increase in the average muscle cramp pain score, and the group with physical activity, the decrease in the average muscle cramp pain score is statistically significant. In line with these results, a review study by Elsedawy et al. [23], Albadr et al. [24], and Dhudum and Bhore [25].

In this way, Elsedawy et al. [23] in Egypt taught 50 patients in the age range of 60-65 years to perform stretching exercises during dialysis, and after one month, the patients were examined for muscle cramps. According to the findings, the amount of muscle cramps before and after performing stretching exercises during dialysis was statistically significant, and a significant decrease in the amount of muscle cramps was observed after performing intradialysis stretching exercises. Therefore, stretching exercises during dialysis should be combined with routine nursing care for hemodialysis patients [23]. The results of the study by Dhudum and Bhore [25] also indicated the effectiveness of stretching exercises during dialysis. In addition, Albadr et al. [24], in a study examined hemodialysis patients who are dialyzed with fistula after performing sports exercises for 2 months in the form of stretching exercises, range of motion exercises, and isometric exercises. The results showed that intradialysis exercise can improve muscle strength and reduce muscle cramps caused by hemodialysis [24].

According to the results obtained from different studies, most of the studies conducted were consistent with the results of the present study, which means that the use of this non-invasive treatment plan as one of the non-pharmacological nursing interventions is valuable, cheap, applicable, and effective can reduce the pain of muscle cramps in these patients. The findings of the current research, while confirming and supporting the research hypotheses, showed that physical activity has a positive effect on muscle cramp pain in hemodialysis patients. Therefore, it is necessary for nurses to effectively provide advice and training appropriate to the condition of the disease to perform physical activities in hemodialysis patients. In addition, managers and officials of the health system should improve their health by adopting new measures and policies, as well as by holding educational programs and workshops related to the key role of physical activity in patients. These conditions can create an optimistic view over time in patients and their families.

Conclusion

This study was conducted to determine the effect of physical activity on muscle cramps in patients referred to the hemodialysis department. The results of this study showed that there was no significant difference between the average muscle cramp pain before the intervention in the control and intervention groups. However, there was a significant difference between the average muscle cramp pain scores after the intervention in the control and intervention groups, so after the intervention, the average muscle cramp pain score in the intervention group was reduced compared to the control group. The present study showed that physical activity was effective in muscle cramp pain. Therefore, considering the importance of the role of educational interventions in improving the health of patients and their caregivers, the managers of medical and health centers can improve the health of patients by adopting measures and educational programs and workshops related to teaching the key role of physical activity.

Acknowledgments: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

Financial support: None.

Ethics statement: None.

References
  1. Carney EF. The impact of chronic kidney disease on global health. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(5):251. doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0268-7
  2. Kovesdy CP. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: An update 2022. Kidney Int Suppl. 2022;12(1):7-11. doi:10.1016/j.kisu.2021.11.003
  3. Levey AS, Eckardt K-U, Dorman NM, Christiansen SL, Hoorn EJ, Ingelfinger JR, et al. Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: Report of a kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) consensus conference. Kidney Int. 2020;97(6):1117-29. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.02.010
  4. Liu Y, He Q, Li Q, Tian M, Li X, Yao X, et al. Global incidence and death estimates of chronic kidney disease due to hypertension from 1990 to 2019, an ecological analysis of the global burden of diseases 2019 study. BMC Nephrol. 2023;24(1):352. doi:10.1186/s12882-023-03391-z
  5. Gupta R, Woo K, Yi JA. Epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease. Semin Vasc Surg. 2021;34(1):71-8. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.010
  6. Fiseha T, Osborne NJ. Burden of end-stage renal disease of undetermined etiology in Africa. Ren Replace Ther. 2023;9(1):44. doi:10.1186/s41100-023-00497-w
  7. Bouya S, Balouchi A, Rafiemanesh H, Hesaraki M. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Iranian general population: A meta‐analysis and systematic review. Ther Apher Dial. 2018;22(6):594-9. doi:10.1111/1744-9987.12716
  8. Dehghani A, Alishavandi S, Nourimajalan N, Fallahzadeh H, Rahmanian V. Prevalence of chronic kidney diseases and its determinants among Iranian adults: Results of the first phase of Shahedieh cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23(1):203. doi:10.1186/s12882-022-02832-5
  9. Baker LA, O'Sullivan TF, Robinson KA, Graham‐Brown MP, Major RW, Ashford RU, et al. Primary skeletal muscle cells from chronic kidney disease patients retain hallmarks of cachexia in vitro. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(2):1238-49. doi:10.1002/jcsm.12802
  10. Setiawan T, Sari IN, Wijaya YT, Julianto NM, Muhammad JA, Lee H, et al. Cancer cachexia: Molecular mechanisms and treatment strategies. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16(1):54. doi:10.1186/s13045-023-01454-0
  11. Webster JM, Kempen LJ, Hardy RS, Langen RC. Inflammation and skeletal muscle wasting during cachexia. Front Physiol. 2020;11:597675. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.597675
  12. Seto Y, Kimura M, Matsunaga T, Miyasita E, Kanno Y. Long-term body composition changes in patients undergoing hemodialysis: A single-center retrospective study. Ren Replace Ther. 2022;8(1):57. doi:10.1186/s41100-022-00448-x
  13. Fukuzaki N, Suzuki Y, Uchida J, Nakajima T, Yamamoto S, Imamura K, et al. Changes in body composition of patients undergoing hemodialysis during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A retrospective longitudinal study. Ren Replace Ther. 2023;9(1):12. doi:10.1186/s41100-023-00465-4
  14. Keane D, Gardiner C, Lindley E, Lines S, Woodrow G, Wright M. Changes in body composition in the two years after ınitiation of haemodialysis: A retrospective cohort study. Nutrients. 2016;8(11):702. doi:10.3390/nu8110702
  15. Kesik G, Altinok Ersoy N. The effect of nonpharmacologic interventions for muscle cramps and restless leg syndrome in hemodialysis patients: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ther Apher Dial. 2023;27(4):636-54. doi:10.1111/1744-9987.13968
  16. Takahashi A. The pathophysiology of leg cramping during dialysis and the use of carnitine in its treatment. Physiol Rep. 2021;9(21):e15114. doi:10.14814/phy2.15114
  17. Gerogianni G. Factors affecting pain in hemodialysis and non-pharmacological management. Cureus. 2023;15(2). doi:10.7759/cureus.35448
  18. Huang HY, Hung KS, Yeh ML, Chou HL, Yeh AL, Liao TY. Breathing-based leg exercises during hemodialysis improve quality of life: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(8):1175-84. doi:10.1177/02692155211000738
  19. Zhang C, Mu H, Yang YF, Zhang Y, Gou WJ. Effect of aromatherapy on quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ren Fail. 2023;45(1):2164202. doi:10.1080/0886022X.2022.2164202
  20. Meneklİ T, Durmaz YÇ. Effect of lavender aromatherapy on pruritus, anxiety, and sleep quality of patients undergoing hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial. TMR Integr Nurs. 2021;5(5):163-9. doi:10.53388/TMRIN2021163169
  21. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain ıntensity in adults: A systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;41(6):1073-93. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016
  22. Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal A, Iqbal ZA. Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. J Pain Res. 2018;11(null):851-6. doi:10.2147/JPR.S158847
  23. Elsedawy AE, Mohsen MM, El-Saidy TM, Shehata HS. Effect of intradialytic stretching exercises on muscle cramps among elderly patients undergoing hemodialysis. Menoufia Nurs J. 2023;8(1):1-11. doi:10.21608/menj.2023.284020
  24. Albadr AH, Azer SZ, Abd Elhamed N, Mostafa NM. Effect of intradialytic hemodialysis exercises on fatigue and leg cramps. Assiut Sci Nurs J. 2020;8(20):132-41. doi:10.21608/asnj.2020.80746
  25. Dhudum B, Bhore NR. Intradialytic stretching exercises on muscle cramps: A systematic review. J Crit Rev. 2020;7(15):4390-8.

 


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Sheshadri A, Kittiskulnam P, Johansen KL. Investigating the Effects of Physical Activity on the Amount of Muscle Cramp Pain in Hemodialysis Patients. J Integr Nurs Palliat Care. 2024;5:8-13. https://doi.org/10.51847/wZhaI3rJNj
APA
Sheshadri, A., Kittiskulnam, P., & Johansen, K. L. (2024). Investigating the Effects of Physical Activity on the Amount of Muscle Cramp Pain in Hemodialysis Patients. Journal of Integrative Nursing and Palliative Care, 5, 8-13. https://doi.org/10.51847/wZhaI3rJNj
Related articles:
Most viewed articles:
Volume 6 - 2025